Real Estate Council of Alberta Fundamentals Practice Exam

Which type of tort does not require proving negligence or intent, but focuses on the act itself?

1. Negligent Tort

2. Intentional Tort

3. Strict Liability Tort

4. Liability Tort

The correct answer is: Strict Liability Tort

The correct answer is focused on the concept of strict liability torts, which are unique in that they do not require proof of negligence or intent. In strict liability cases, the law holds a party responsible for damages or harm caused by their actions or products, regardless of intent or negligence. This approach is commonly applied in situations involving inherently dangerous activities or defective products, where the mere fact that harm occurred is sufficient for liability to be established. In contrast, negligent torts require proof that the defendant failed to act with reasonable care, leading to harm. Intentional torts involve actions taken with the intent to cause harm, necessitating evidence of the perpetrator's state of mind. Liability tort is more of a general term and does not specifically describe a recognized category of torts under common law. Therefore, strict liability torts are distinguished by their focus on the outcome of an act, rather than the intent behind it or the care taken in carrying it out, making it the only type in this context that aligns with the characteristics described in the question.